“There are years of investment in platforms, networks, and standards that still have to be supported. The challenge is to bring in new capabilities without rendering those legacy systems obsolete”— Mark Rushton, VITEC
The rise in defense spending across Europe presents an opportunity for ministries to rethink their intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) approaches. The central difficulty lies in upgrading systems while preserving the value of older, existing equipment. Priorities like interoperability, protected transmission, and budget management are reshaping how video and data are handled across ISR environments.
“Backwards compatibility is absolutely critical,” stated Mark Rushton, Global Defense and Security Lead at VITEC. “There are years, sometimes decades, of investment in platforms, networks, and standards that still have to be supported. The challenge is to bring in new capabilities without rendering those legacy systems obsolete.”
Striking a Balance Between Modernization and Older Systems
Military organizations have poured billions into ISR platforms that are still useful for operations but are technically outdated. Completely replacing them would be too costly and politically difficult. As a result, ministries are concentrating on enhancement, adding new IP-based video solutions onto their current setups.
This approach mirrors a wider pattern among NATO allies, who are trying to prolong the service life of current fleets while also introducing a limited number of new, more affordable ISR assets. Through gradual modernization, ministries can protect their prior investments while adapting to shifting operational needs.
The next hurdle is securing these systems without causing delays. Encryption is an absolute requirement for ISR networks, but historically, adding security to video feeds has increased latency—an issue for systems dependent on near-real-time awareness.
Encryption, Latency, and Operational Compromises
Rushton observed that contemporary encoding hardware limits the encryption overhead to only a few frames, keeping total delay at levels that are manageable for operations.
From a market standpoint, this equilibrium is important. Defense purchasers need to show that spending increases lead not only to better capability but also to greater efficiency. The capacity to implement encryption without harming performance allows ministries to bolster network security without having to build entirely new systems.
Interoperability in a Fragmented Environment
NATO-developed standards have enhanced interoperability, but political factors restrict how freely data is actually exchanged. Zero-trust frameworks and role-based access controls are becoming a compromise, enabling collaboration while letting individual nations decide what intelligence is shared and with whom.
This dual approach—interoperable in theory, selective in practice—puts pressure on vendors to build systems that can adjust video streams for coalition partners while still meeting national security needs. Transcoding and format conversion, once secondary functions, are now vital to ISR work.
The Economics of Disposable ISR Platforms
Economic factors are also driving change. Countries are shifting away from investing in extremely expensive, custom-built aircraft and instead choosing lower-cost, mission-specific platforms. Some of these are designed with the understanding that they might not return from hostile zones. This move toward “financial resilience” demands that ISR payloads, including video systems, be small, energy-efficient, and budget-friendly.
For the defense technology market, this evolution creates demand for commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) solutions that offer adequate performance without the high price of fully custom design. The shrinking gap between military specifications and COTS technology is speeding up the use of commercial codecs and hardware in ISR roles.
Market Impact: A New ISR Value Chain
The ISR ecosystem is now defined by three key priorities: extend the life of legacy investments, incorporate encryption and interoperability standards, and enable quick deployment of affordable platforms. Vendors that can address all three at once are well-placed to capture a larger portion of defense modernization funds.
Analysts point out that the increase in European defense spending—with Germany, the UK, France, and Poland all aiming for GDP shares of 3 percent or more—does not automatically mean large-scale purchases of entirely new fleets. Instead, investment is expected to go toward modular upgrades and gradual improvements. Video and data systems that can connect old and new architectures while enabling flexible coalition cooperation are central to this market trend.
Video Technology Partners Adjust
Companies such as VITEC are modifying their development plans to match these changing needs. By concentrating on video encoding and transcoding systems that work with both modern and legacy platforms, the firm tackles the compatibility issues ministries face. Its products are designed to digitize video at the sensor level, encrypt streams while in motion, and transcode for coalition partners without necessitating the replacement of current networks or hardware.
The focus on commercial off-the-shelf codecs also mirrors the economic realities influencing ISR procurement. Defense organizations are prioritizing solutions that can deliver mission-ready performance without long development timelines or excessive costs. VITEC’s work on compact, low-power encoders places it within a larger industry movement toward modular, scalable, and financially resilient ISR platforms.
Final Takeaway
Modernizing ISR video and data is no longer a question of what is technologically possible, but of what is economically and politically viable. Encryption overhead, latency trade-offs, and interoperability standards are now evaluated not in isolation, but based on their effect on legacy systems and defense budgets.
Companies operating at this crossroads—providing IP-based, low-latency video solutions that can be integrated into existing ISR environments—will shape how quickly and cost-effectively nations respond to new threats. The outcome is a market focused less on disruptive replacement and more on strategic optimization, a steady reconfiguration of ISR value chains to extend the past while preparing for the future.
Airrion Andrews
Mindshare Capture
email us here
